Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3100 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is 1343 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 250 - 59 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
75.89743589743591%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
75.8779800051269%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $199 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
