Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 390 is 717 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390 - 35 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390
- Performs up to 53% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 52 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 8 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Radeon R9 390
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
30.46875%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
24.381249999999998%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $329 |
| 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
