Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the more expensive Radeon PRO W7500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1623 days older than the more expensive Radeon PRO W7500.
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7500
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 70 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Radeon PRO W7500 - 63 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Radeon PRO W7500 - £395.99 vs £417.19
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dead Space than Radeon PRO W7500 - £6.29 vs £6.77 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £417.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
63
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£395.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £395.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
89%
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$429 | MSRP | $279 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1344 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |