Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms the cheaper Arc A750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6800 is 491 days older than the cheaper Arc A750.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Performs up to 17% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Arc A750 - 123 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A750 - 32 vs 8 GB
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Up to 89% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6800 - £265.28 vs £2319.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Radeon Pro W6800 - £2.53 vs £18.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6800 - 225 vs 250 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
123
100%
Value, £/FPS
£18.85/FPS
13%
Price, £
£2319
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2163 minutes ago
Buy for £265.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
222.7 GPixel/s
82%
Texel Fillrate
556.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jun 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Alchemist |
$2249 | MSRP | $289 |
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
2075 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
2320 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |