Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6600 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6600 is 4257 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Performs up to 156% better in Stray than GeForce 210 - 92 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0.5 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 85% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6600 - £39.99 vs £274.03
- Up to 63% better value when playing Stray than Radeon Pro W6600 - £1.11 vs £2.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6600 - 31 vs 100 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
92
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.98/FPS
37%
Price, £
£274.03
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £274.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Jun 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$649 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
2580 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |