Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 380 outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 380 is 1245 days older than Radeon Pro Vega 20.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 100 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 380
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro Vega 20 - 47 vs 46 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Mobile • Nov 14th, 2018
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Mobile • Nov 14th, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
41.06 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.6 GTexel/s
94%
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
31.04 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
108.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 1024-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
189.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 815 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 970 MHz |
| 1283 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 740 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
