Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon 680M have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti - 50 vs 285 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Performs up to 306% better in Starfield than Radeon 680M - 65 vs 16 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
33.71647509578544%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
16.85823754789272%
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $799 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 12 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6X |
System-Shared | Bus | 192-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2610 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1313 MHz |