Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 390 is 2756 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390 - 50 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390
- Performs up to 42% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon 680M - 27 vs 19 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
65.99999999999999%
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
90.9090909090909%
Texel Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $329 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 8 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |