Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Radeon 660M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 3227 days older than Radeon 660M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 660M
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 40 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Radeon 660M - 82 vs 75 FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
98%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon 660M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |