Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon W-11955M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 187 days older than Xeon W-11955M.
Advantages of Xeon W-11955M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon W-11955M - 121 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-11955M - 32 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-11955M | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1499 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |