Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon Gold 6154 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1904 days newer than Xeon Gold 6154.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon Gold 6154 - 162 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 - 170 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Gold 6154 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€451.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €451.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon Gold 6154 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon Gold | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 16 |
36 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
200 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |