Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4333 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5620 - 147 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 58 vs 80 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |