In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2680 v3 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-14700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 120 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 94% faster in Battlefield 6 – 132 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 94% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$405.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
12-core
60%
L3 Cache
30 MB
91%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2680 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $1,745.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
120 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
