Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3612 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 344% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-2640 - 271 vs 61 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 58 vs 95 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |