In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2640 v3 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 90 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 47% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X
- Up to 87% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 87% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2640 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $939.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM5 |
90W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
