In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2640 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2640 v2 vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2640 v2 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2640 v2 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2640 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
