Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 160 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |