Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2620 - 440 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 16 vs 12 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
