Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 397 vs 334 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
397
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€229.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €229.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1777 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |