Buy on Amazon
€671.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $699
Availability
MSRP $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 805 vs 671 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
805
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€671.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
