In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 5 5600X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $6 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1650 v2
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 5600X
- Up to 52% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 52% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 3% cheaper – $223.62 vs $229.95
- Up to 3% cheaper
- Up to 36% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.30 vs $3.59/FPS
- Up to 36% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
64 FPS
66%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
66%
Price, $
$229.95
97%
Value, $/FPS
$3.59/FPS
64%
Ryzen 5 5600X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
97 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
73 FPS
100%
Price, $
$223.62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Ryzen 5 5600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Ryzen 5 5600X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 5 5600X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 5600X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
