Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1620 - 337 vs 298 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
337
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€229.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €229.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2084 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |