Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 246 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€671.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7440 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |