In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1275 v5 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1275 v5
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 80 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 37% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 17 days newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 5 years and 17 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1275 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1275 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$350.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
80 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
