Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3504 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E3-1260L - 237 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 32 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€310.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €310.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |