Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3868 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 44% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1260L - 130 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 24 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |