In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1240 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-12600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 69 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 45% less energy
Core i5-12600K
- Up to 78% faster in Battlefield 6 – 112 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 78% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs May 14, 2012
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Core i5-12600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-12600K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
112 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
84 FPS
100%
Price, $
$184.46
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Core i5-12600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Core i5-12600K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v2
May 14th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12600K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v2 May 14th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12600K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 14th, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
69 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
