In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1220 v3 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 5 7600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 80 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Up to 84% faster in Battlefield 6 – 125 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 84% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
125 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$185.47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1220 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$203.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
