Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E-2314 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 139 days newer than Xeon E-2314.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E-2314 - 239 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2314 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |