Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E-2236 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 526 days newer than Xeon E-2236.
Advantages of Xeon E-2236
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 80 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E-2236 - 230 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2236 - 32 vs 12 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7603 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2236 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |