Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 478 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 128 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $219.10 vs $750.75
- Up to 74% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $1.90 vs $7.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
112
88%
Value, €/FPS
€7.44/FPS
26%
Price, €
€833.33
29%
Buy for €833.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |