Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $263.58 vs $833.33
- Up to 68% better value when playing Control than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $1.30 vs $4.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.11/FPS
32%
Price, €
€833.33
31%
Buy for €833.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€263.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €263.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |