Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1211 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 379 vs 351 FPS
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $62.33 vs $726.40
- Up to 92% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.18 vs $2.30 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 58 vs 250 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €806.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
379
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |