Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $190.73 vs $269.95
- Up to 18% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i7-14700K - $1.21 vs $1.48 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 202 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 28 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
175
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €211.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
82%
Price, €
€299.65
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 20 |
24 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |