The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $574.76 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 86% cheaper – $91.91 vs $666.67
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
219
100%
Min 1% FPS
144
100%
Price, €
€666.67
13%
Value, €/FPS
€3.04/FPS
18%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$699.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
120 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 5200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |