In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 7950X is much faster than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 7950X
- Up to 105% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 105% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 145 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 7950X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
63 FPS
49%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
48%
Price, $
$1078.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 7950X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 7950X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
73%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
86%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
63%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
46%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X Sep 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$699.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM5 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
| 170W | Power Consumption | 145W |
| Other Features | ||
| 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
