Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-10400F - 210 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $63.05 vs $558.55
- Up to 86% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $0.36 vs $2.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
14%
Price, €
€558.55
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €558.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 410 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.05
885%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 410 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |