In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 7900 is much faster than the Core i7-7700K. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $213 more expensive!
Ryzen 9 7900
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 10 days newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years and 10 days newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 65 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
Core i7-7700K
- Up to 52% cheaper – $194.01 vs $407.00
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.45 vs $3.20/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 7900 vs Core i7-7700K: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$407
47%
Value, $/FPS
$3.2/FPS
77%
Core i7-7700K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
79 FPS
62%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
62%
Price, $
$194.01
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 7900 vs Core i7-7700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 7900 vs Core i7-7700K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Core i7-7700K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
46%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 7900 Jan 14th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7700K Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 14th, 2023 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $429.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM5 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 5200 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Radeon Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
