In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 6900HX is faster than the Core i7-7700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Up to 23% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 9 days newer – Jan 13, 2022 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 5 years and 9 days newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 45 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i7-7700K
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i7-7700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-7700K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
79 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
81%
Price, $
$194.01
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i7-7700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i7-7700K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 13th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-7700K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX Jan 13th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7700K Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 13th, 2022 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP7 | Socket | LGA1151 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Radeon 680M | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
