Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 5950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 9 5950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 425 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 5950X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $297.29 vs $324.32
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-12900F - $1.37 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 9 5950X - 223 vs 217 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
217
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€297.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €297.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
94%
Price, €
€324.32
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for €324.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Vermeer | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |