In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 3900X is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3900X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$499.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
105 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
