In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 3900X is slightly faster than the Core i7-6700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3900X
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Aug 05, 2015
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
Core i7-6700K
- Consumes up to 13% less energy – 91 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 13% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-6700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Average FPS
76 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
88%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-6700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-6700K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700K Aug 5th, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Aug 5th, 2015 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $339.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
