In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 3900X is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3900X
- Up to 5% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Battlefield 6
Core i7-10700
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-10700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
83 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
95%
Price, $
$299
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.6/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-10700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-10700 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 105W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
