Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 26% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - 216 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $58.36 vs $404.50
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $0.34 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 77 vs 120 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
18%
Price, €
€404.5
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €404.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
172
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€58.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €58.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | vs | Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 77 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |