The Ryzen 7 2700X is a clear winner – it's a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 2700 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $9.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700X
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 5% cheaper – $158.56 vs $167.57
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 2700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700X
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€167.57
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
97%
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
98%
Min 1% FPS
120
99%
Price, €
€158.56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 2700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 2700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 2700 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| $329.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
