Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2007 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $150.96 vs $351.41
- Up to 33% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-14900K - $2.99 vs $4.48 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 55% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700X - 87 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
56
64%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €167.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.48/FPS
67%
Price, €
€390.07
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |