In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 7 2700X is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $347 cheaper!
Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 77% cheaper – $103.39 vs $449.98
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 74% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.37 vs $5.29/FPS
- Up to 74% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 105 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 7 2700X
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
75 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
88%
Price, $
$103.39
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
22%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
26%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.35 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X Apr 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 19th, 2018 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $329.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA2066 |
105 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
