The Ryzen 7 2700 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-950 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $86.40 cheaper!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 35% cheaper – $158.56 vs $244.96
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-950
The Ryzen 7 2700 is better in every way
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i7-950 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€158.56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i7-950 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i7-950 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i7-950 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 2700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| $299.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
