Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $158.56 vs $201.80
- Up to 16% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - $1.02 vs $1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 165 vs 155 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
155
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 277 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
84%
Price, €
€201.8
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €201.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |