The Ryzen 7 1700 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $14.24 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 1700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Up to 8% cheaper – $160.38 vs $174.62
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 7 1700 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Ryzen 7 1700 vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 1700
Mar 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
178
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, €
€174.62
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
98%
Ryzen 7 1700 vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 1700 vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 1700 vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 1700
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 1700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |